On 11/17/06, David Gowers <00ai99@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/17/06, Nils Nordén <ngnorden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So this feature is already implemented....now all it needs is some tweaking. > > Here I have illustrated some tests with the advantage of flow in > photoshop, and compared it to the behavior of the gimp airbrush. At > the bottom you can also see the difference in behavior between the > gimp airbrush rate, and photoshop flow. > > http://www.turtleart.net/stuff/flow.jpg > Your image is unfortunately likely to be misleading. I have the strong suspicion that Photoshop is set up to also modulate opacity according to tablet pressure (unless you've done that image with a mouse, which seems unlikely.) I suggest you check any opacity-related settings and remake the image.
The Photoshop settings I used for opacity were 100%, and Brushes Palette > Other Dynamics > Opacity control: pen pressure Gimp settings were Opacity: 100,0 and Pressure sensitivity: Opacity [check] So, there should be no differences there between the opacity settings in both apps. What is it you find fishy? I used a wacom tablet btw. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
