gg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Ahh, I did not see what your previous comment meant. Caught out by this > damn ML reply-to setting again. > > I'm subscribed to several lists which operate in a more logical way: I > get a msg from the list , I hit "reply" in my email client and it > replies to the list. > > Since the msg came from the ml not from your address the reply-to header > is counter intuitive. It actually isn't. You may want to read this: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Kind regards, Mukund
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
