Re: Script-Fu procedure blurb review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 saulgoode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:34:52 -0700
> From: saulgoode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  Script-Fu procedure blurb review
>

> initially set the generated image to "clean". It seems unnecessary to
> prompt for "save" when closing an unmodified logo; the logo can easily
> be regenerated with the same values by re-running the script.

I've considered this before, it would probably be a good idea.  The only
reason I could come up with as to why you might want to mark the image as
dirty/modified was in cases where there was a stack full of undo steps the
user might want to play with.  I generally prefer to allow easier
modification of things laterby providing seperate layers.

-- 
Alan

_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux