Hi, On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 11:59 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: > The switch over to Tiny-Fu will result in a certain amount of > incompatibilities anyway so it might be a good time to reconsider. We are most likely not going to do the switch to Tiny-Fu until those incompatibilities have been sorted out. There might be some scripts that will stop to work when Script-Fu is changed to use the tiny-fu interpreter, but those scripts can basically be considered broken already. Broken because they are using undocumented misbehaviour of the SIOD interpreter. > > it makes a lot of sense to clean up the short strings now. Other changes > > can be considered after 2.4. > > CVS will still have the long descriptions if anyone wants to go back and > add then in again. Now you are forcing me to repeat myself again. There are basically no scripts in CVS that have a long description. The scripts are merely undocumented. If more than five scripts would use anything longer than half a sentence as their help string, we would of course not throw it away. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
