Re: Script-Fu procedure blurb review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Sven Neumann wrote:

> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:16:33 +0200
> From: Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx>
> To: Alan Horkan <horkana@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gimp-devel <gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  Script-Fu procedure blurb review
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:16 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> > Plugins have both a short summary description ("blurb")  be and a longer
> > more descriptive help.  It might be worth making things consistent and
> > doing the same for scripts.
>
> As I already explained,

Only read your message after I had sent mine.

> we can't easily do that without breaking backwards compatibility.

The switch over to Tiny-Fu will result in a certain amount of
incompatibilities anyway so it might be a good time to reconsider.

> it makes a lot of sense to clean up the short strings now. Other changes
> can be considered after 2.4.

CVS will still have the long descriptions if anyone wants to go back and
add then in again.

-- 
Alan

_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux