Re: Script-Fu procedure blurb review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:02 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:

> > initially set the generated image to "clean". It seems unnecessary to
> > prompt for "save" when closing an unmodified logo; the logo can easily
> > be regenerated with the same values by re-running the script.
> 
> I've considered this before, it would probably be a good idea.  The only
> reason I could come up with as to why you might want to mark the image as
> dirty/modified was in cases where there was a stack full of undo steps the
> user might want to play with.  I generally prefer to allow easier
> modification of things laterby providing seperate layers.

Yes, it is propably a good idea.  But can we please focus on one issue?
I would really like to get a patch that only changes the blurbs and
marks them for translation. Other changes will be considered, but please
submit them separately.


Sven


_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux