pcg@xxxxxxxx ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
However, the "layer effects" people want is (in my eyes) exactly that:
apply some saturation effect to a layer that you can later change
without loss of fidelity.
And that'd be pretty groovy, and it'd work BECAUSE the
layer effect is conceptually (and in reality) a separate
processing step rather than an attribute of the data it
applies to. This is precisely how I see the layer mask
versus the alpha channel.
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ adam@xxxxxxxx http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
Consume Less, Live More
