On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 12:33:14PM -0800, Daniel Rogers wrote: > > Or, as I suggested in an earlier email, but I don't think was stated > very clearly, implement anti-erase as a layer mask (whether or not the > user can actually see the extra layer). If you want to implement anti-erase as a layer mask, then for antierase to be available, this layer mask (not shown to user) has to be present all the time (if not, the information needed for anti-erase would be lost). But how this situation differs from separate alpha channel -- except for storing the same data in a much more complex way than necessary? Or did I missed something? Yeti
