[Gimp-developer] Re: Re: caching considerations in gegl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2003-03-11 at 1233.14 -0800):
> > Would just antierase users be happy with layers masks? This feature is
> > ignored a lot, and I think it does the same, you hide and unhide areas
> > as you want, keeping the colour info. If yes, get rid of antierase.
> Or, as I suggested in an earlier email, but I don't think was stated 
> very clearly, implement anti-erase as a layer mask (whether or not the 
> user can actually see the extra layer).

Could make sense, after all quick mask is a temp channel and fast ops
from / to selection.

GSR
 

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux