Re: [Gimp-developer] caching considerations in gegl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:41:30AM -0800, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> Weight the pixel value by the alpha value, just like you do with any 
> other operation on pixels.  This makes sense when alpha is defined to be 
> the coverage.  If a pixel is only really half covered, their should half 
> the impulse response on the convolution kernel.

And so, if you're blurring with some transparent area, it's equivalent to
blurring with black? Doesn't make sense to me -- or am I missing something?

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux