Re: [Gimp-developer] caching considerations in gegl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Ernst Lippe <ernstl@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> But how do you handle the case when a user would try to make a transparent
> pixel non-transparent. This pixel should then get a color, but which
> one? White and black are possible choices, and in most cases the user
> will want neither of them. Perhaps every operation that potentially
> could change a transparent pixel should have an additional argument
> that specifies the color for those pixels?

which operation (besides the evil anti-erase) wouldn't have such a
color information? The only operation I can think of that makes a
transparent pixel non-transparent is some sort of painting with one of
the paint tools. Such a paint operation always has the color
information we need.


Salut, Sven

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux