From: Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> Date: 05 Dec 2001 14:15:42 +0100 what would be the additional features you have in mind here? I don't see any advantange in relying on advanced capabilities in the help browser. I agree however that shipping the HTML with the sources is not a perfect solution. Converting at installation time is an option, but then it adds a new requirement to the build environment and I doubt that a lot of people have a working featureful XSLT processor installed. It is probably a good idea to continue to do the conversion when packaging the help tarball (on 'make dist'). Gimp-print generates the HTML (and .pdf, and .ps) manuals at packaging time. The docbook toolchain seems to be incredibly fragile; different versions of tools emit different warnings and/or fail in different ways. I would not recommend requiring the docbook toolchain at compile time. -- Robert Krawitz <rlk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf@xxxxxxxxxxxx Project lead for Gimp Print/stp -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton
