Hi, Ralf Engels <Ralf.Engels@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Bug nr. (choose a number) Bucket fill behaves strange with existing selection > Bucket fill behaves different when a selection is active. what do you mean by "behaves strange" ? The Bucket Fill behaviour is intended and I don't see why you categorize it as a bug. If no selection is active, the tool tries to follow the metaphore of filling color into the picture that flows until it is stopped by some picture detail. I think this is the common way how Bucket Fill tools behave. It behaves differently if a selection is active since when a selection is made, the user will expect that the entire selection gets filled. I must admit that this is not obvious. > An other point is, that you can make the same thing setting the threshold to > 255. yes obviously. > -fill with foreground/background color is usefull but does not really > integrate with the tools. does it have to? And if so, how do you propose it should? > -bucket fill behaves not intuitive (and works to slow with threshold set to > 255) yes we could optimize the threshold=255 case but I doubt it's worth the hassle. > -too many tools for filling a lot of people already find it difficult that there's no tool for Pattern filling but I'm open for suggestions. Salut, Sven
