Hi, > > stuff to sourceforge is a bad idea from the very beginning since it is > > confusing to the users. > > another thing: why is this confusing to users? Has anybody complained > to you? At least on this list (or the sourceforge lists) no sign > of confusion was in sight. The web-pages make it quite clear what > gimp-plug-ins is used for. It's confusing since the gimp stuff should come from one server not from a bunch of differently named and hard to find places. > So this might be a false alarm. I really don't think it looks as > bad. Especially if you consider that such a thing as asked for since about > a year, and we _still_ douldn't have even something remotely similar if > there weren't that sourceforge project. Huh? I'm sure that if a group of people volunteers to create something useful and gimp-related and ask for access to the server, they will be given that possibility. That's my whole point: Why do you put the effort into sourceforge instead of putting it into www.gimp.org where other parts of the website might benefit from it too? Salut, Sven
