Hi, > I don't know. Graphics samples don't really fall under my vision of the > plug-in site, but they can go there if they need a home, I guess. I can > add it to the task list, and I'll give access to the web server (at > sourceforge) to anyone who wants to implement it and demonstrates half a > clue. They belong to www.gimp.org and of course people interested in working on that stuff can get access to the server (with similar restrictions to what you said: demonstrate half a clue...). > <simpara role="JadedBastard"> > Bah, it's hopeless, there's cruft at gimp.org, you got your gimp package > from Helixcode.com, or the "gimp toolkit" from gtk.org, users go to > gimp-savvy.com, developers get bug reports and CVS from gnome.org, and > mailing lists run under the berkeley.edu domain but they're archived at > who-knows-where. What's wrong with adding sourceforge, geocities, and > MSN into the lists of hosts too? > </> It's the wrong solution to a bigger problem. If you think that having all those different sites is a problem, why don't you help the gimp.org maintainers to change this to the better, but instead add another problem in the same spirit...? Salut, Sven
