Re: Request for new, high-quality, brushes (and maybe patterns too)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 02:45:01AM +0200, Sven Neumann <neumanns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> stuff to sourceforge is a bad idea from the very beginning since it is
> confusing to the users.

another thing: why is this confusing to users? Has anybody complained
to you?  At least on this list (or the sourceforge lists) no sign
of confusion was in sight. The web-pages make it quite clear what
gimp-plug-ins is used for.

So this might be a false alarm. I really don't think it looks as
bad. Especially if you consider that such a thing as asked for since about
a year, and we _still_ douldn't have even something remotely similar if
there weren't that sourceforge project.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux