Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 11:12:35 +0200 From: Sven Neumann <neumanns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > So this might be a false alarm. I really don't think it looks as > bad. Especially if you consider that such a thing as asked for since about > a year, and we _still_ douldn't have even something remotely similar if > there weren't that sourceforge project. Huh? I'm sure that if a group of people volunteers to create something useful and gimp-related and ask for access to the server, they will be given that possibility. That's my whole point: Why do you put the effort into sourceforge instead of putting it into www.gimp.org where other parts of the website might benefit from it too? Alternatively, why not put all of the Gimp on Sourceforge rather than trying to duplicate their effort? That doesn't prevent www.gimp.org from existing; you may even be able to DNS alias the appropriate *.gimp.org site to Sourceforge, although I'm not positive about that. -- Robert Krawitz <rlk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf@xxxxxxxxxxxx Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton
