Roman Joost (Montag, 25. August 2008, 22:19): > There is one point still open though, the integration into autoconf > of the Makefile. Ulf - you put a lot of effort in the Makefile. Do > you think you could spent a bit more time on this? You mean merging the Makefile into our current Makefile.am? I can try it and see what happens... > We have to do this manually unfortunately. There is no better way > around this IMHO. A program would also only be able to just guess. > Let's face the advantages: we do have some time for clean up ;) Either clean up or try to patch 'xml2po', so that it can handle those problematic cases. > How do we want to proceed? Do the authors (please yell know ;) want > to do a migration for themself, using a small script or should > someone of us (Ulf or me probably) should do the migration? > > If no one of the authors votes for step 1, than I propose a migration > using step 2 the next weekend. Meanwhile I have committed a simple shell script you can use to extract localized XML files, e.g. mkdir -p tmp/xx bash tools/profile-xml.sh --srcdir oldsrc --destdir tmp/xx --lang xx It's just a wrapper for 'xsltproc', and it may be buggy... > We do need a fixed date anyways, where we start the migration. That > means, that after the date only the work and the cleanup on the po > files continues. After starting the migration we should keep the current multi-lang XML files up to date untill we definitely know everything works. Do you mean that with "the work"? > It's probably a good time to do another release before the > migration (which would be 2.4.2), Yes!! :-) BTW, I think we should remove any entries before 2008-07-30 from the branches/xml2po-support/ChangeLog file. And maybe it's a good idea to split (and compress?) the trunk/ChangeLog file (1.4MB!). Ulf _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
