Re: Gimp-docs Digest, Vol 51, Issue 8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> So IMHO we had to add one more step:
>>
>>   0. Check and edit every single source file...
> We have to do this manually unfortunately. There is no better way around
> this IMHO. A program would also only be able to just guess. Let's face
> the advantages: we do have some time for clean up ;)
>
> How do we want to proceed? Do the authors (please yell know ;) want to
> do a migration for themself, using a small script or should someone of
> us (Ulf or me probably) should do the migration?
>
> If no one of the authors votes for step 1, than I propose a migration
> using step 2 the next weekend.

I would go for a script that outputs all areas that it gets confused
in, i.e. no direct en->LANG correspondance. I don't mind manually
correcting a file till the output from such script is empty.
_______________________________________________
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [Scanners]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]     [Webcams]

  Powered by Linux