On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:27:59AM +0100, Vitaly Lomov wrote: > >> So IMHO we had to add one more step: > >> > >> 0. Check and edit every single source file... > > We have to do this manually unfortunately. There is no better way around > > this IMHO. A program would also only be able to just guess. Let's face > > the advantages: we do have some time for clean up ;) > > > > How do we want to proceed? Do the authors (please yell know ;) want to > > do a migration for themself, using a small script or should someone of > > us (Ulf or me probably) should do the migration? > > > > If no one of the authors votes for step 1, than I propose a migration > > using step 2 the next weekend. > > I would go for a script that outputs all areas that it gets confused > in, i.e. no direct en->LANG correspondance. I don't mind manually > correcting a file till the output from such script is empty. Yes, that was what I mean with my last email, sorry for my poor english... -- Marco Ciampa +--------------------+ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +--------------------+ _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
