On 24.10.2006, at 22:03, Nickolay V. Shmyrev wrote:
Have you verified that this actually *does* work? The problem as I remember it was for one, xincludes posed a problem because xsltproc would not handle it in one pass as expected and the second topic was the handling of the languages which caused problems when done differently.
Ups, sorry, I took some time for me to build gimp-help. Here are the results: Without patch real 16m19.951s user 10m46.960s sys 0m19.029s With patch real 12m9.448s user 10m20.895s sys 0m14.569s
There is no difference between results, but simple diff failed todiscover it. That's because of autogenerated id attributes. They differin different builds, that makes comparison harder.
There's no doubt it is faster to run less passes, however the real question
is whether this is equally correct concerning the final results in all
languages and output formats.
For instance it strikes me odd that the labels would be different; not
entirely improbable but strange anyway. Do the crosslinks still work?
Is the XML index file generated and correct?
It's good to hear it works for you and helps you easing a problem, but
before this goes in we really need to make sure it works for everyone
else as well. I can do this, but that'll take a while because it is
number 37 on my todo-list ATM.
Servus,
Daniel
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
