В Вск, 15/10/2006 в 12:31 +0200, Daniel Egger пишет: > On 15.10.2006, at 05:42, Nickolay V. Shmyrev wrote: > > > While looking on high memory usage of xslt transformations I've > > noticed > > the following strange thing. We profile document two times during > > build > > - first we profile to build document for validation in xml subdir, > > second when we build html we also do profiling since we import > > profile-chunk.xsl. > > Have you verified that this actually *does* work? The problem as > I remember it was for one, xincludes posed a problem because > xsltproc would not handle it in one pass as expected and the > second topic was the handling of the languages which caused > problems when done differently. > > Of course with the advent of more recent tools and/or stylesheets > these problems might be gone. > > It should be trivial to compare both results by running the process > before and after modifications by running a copy of the results in > between and then running a diff -Nur <old results> <new results>. > > Would you please do that? > > Servus, > Daniel > Ups, sorry, I took some time for me to build gimp-help. Here are the results: Without patch real 16m19.951s user 10m46.960s sys 0m19.029s With patch real 12m9.448s user 10m20.895s sys 0m14.569s There is no difference between results, but simple diff failed to discover it. That's because of autogenerated id attributes. They differ in different builds, that makes comparison harder.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?koi8-r?Q?=FC=D4=C1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=DE=C1=D3=D4=D8?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=D1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=D0=CF=C4=D0=C9=D3=C1=CE=C1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=C3=C9=C6=D2=CF=D7=CF=CA?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=D0=CF=C4=D0=C9=D3=D8=C0?=
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
