Hi, On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 10:59 +0200, Øyvind Kolås wrote: > Passing in a function means having an expression> parser in-place, in general I feel that doing so is adding unwarranted> complexity. I don't think Mark suggested to pass in a function literally. Hesuggested to allow passing a callback function. GEGL would then callthis function whenever it needs a curves value. His suggestions make alot of sense to me and I think you should consider them. Sven _______________________________________________Gegl-developer mailing listGegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
