Hi, On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 19:09 +0200, Florent Monnier (aka Blue Prawn) wrote: > IMHO the documentation is indeed an important part, since there are often > people coming here willing to help, but which get lost, or don't understand > what's involved. It seems there are even gimp developers arround too who > don't understand the "thing" ;-) so all this maybe explains why gegl > germinates for so long. This said is not to bother the active gegl developers > (I am really gratfull to them for their work), but maybe the current design is > not the best? What I mean is, as it is said in the GNU recommendations : > the source of a free software have to be simple, this way the more people will > be able to understand it, and contribute to it. I don't think the idea behind GEGL could be any simpler and the current implementation design doesn't seem to be needlessly complex. Your accusation is based on wrong assumptions. Sven _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
