Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I wrote:
> I may be utterly, utterly wrong, but I think what's happened makes
> perfect sense at each step of the way but has led to an outcome which
> is crazy.  I publish a lock-free data structure library and I must
> specifically avoid libatomic.

Sorry to be so unconstructive, though.  I don't know enough about GCC
and libatomic to be able to meaningfully make other proposals; I can
only write as an end user.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux