Hi Dave, > > Is there a "correct" way to name these files? I had never seen this ".inc" > idea before. If I change to #include the ".cpp" file, should it be a ".txx" > file? That's the extension I've seen for template files... is it a "real" > one? Just look at the C++-standard-library of gcc - that's exactly the way it is written: the include-files contain the complete template definitions of e.g. std::map, ... . I don't know of a general "correct" way: - looking at the man-page of g++, I would propose something of .hh, .H, .hp, .hxx, .hpp, .HPP, .h++, .tcc - in the standard - library, ".tcc" is used for the template definitions, if they are in a separate file. If not, everything is in a ".h" file - the blitz-library uses .cc and .h - the boost-library includes the definitions and the declarations both in a single ".hpp"-file So: just do it as you like:-) Axel
