Axel Freyn wrote: > > Upps... >> Then, the compiler will do everything for you - it is sufficient to >> compile "graph.cpp". > I wanted to say: "example.cpp" :-) > > Is there a "correct" way to name these files? I had never seen this ".inc" idea before. If I change to #include the ".cpp" file, should it be a ".txx" file? That's the extension I've seen for template files... is it a "real" one? Dave -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Code-compiles-with-g%2B%2B-3.3-but-not-g%2B%2B-4.4-tp25929745p25938320.html Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
