> Sorry, my mistake. > template class Graph<int,int,int>::Graph(int, int, void (*)(char *)); > was wrong;-) the "class" was too much. Try only > template Graph<int,int,int>::Graph(int, int, void (*)(char *)); > > Axel > > Ah, great, thanks! Ok this problem is solved, but it inspired a more general question. I never understood why you have to explicitly instantiate these template classes/functions? I thought that NOT knowing which types were going to be used before hand was kind of the whole point? Why can't the compiler just figure out which types you are trying to use the template class/function with and just instantiate it for you? Thanks, Dave -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Code-compiles-with-g%2B%2B-3.3-but-not-g%2B%2B-4.4-tp25929745p25937853.html Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
