Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I wonder if we could do something more sensible than simply using the >> constant 30. Perhaps some function of FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER, like >> FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER+20, or FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER*2 or even >> MAX (FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER, 29). This would at least solve the problem >> here. > > Why is there a maximum here at all -- some hugely non-linear > algorithm or so? No, just a lot of statically defined arrays. Having a maximum doesn't matter much; having a constant matters. Ian
