Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I wonder if we could do something more sensible than simply using the > constant 30. Perhaps some function of FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER, like > FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER+20, or FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER*2 or even > MAX (FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER, 29). This would at least solve the problem > here. That should work. Making MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS a variable would have some effect on compile time, but simply making it a larger constant shouldn't have any significant effect. Ian
