Akira TAGOH <akira@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Not exactly. fontconfig doesn't stat everey directory at runtime but > relies on the subdir list in the cache to traverse. so if it isn't > outdated and missing some, it won't be picked up by fontconfig. How can it "miss some" if it checks the timestamp of the parent before relying on the list? > Not sure but perhaps it is. my memory is already vague and not sure if > it had a nano second in the mtime. so better testing anyway. Hrm. Is fontconfig even using the higher resolution time when the file system supports it? -- -keith
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
