Re: Can we use base 16, and not 85, for ASCII charset representations?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:52:01PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 13-09-23 02:47 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:25:45PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > 
> > I haven't had time to look this up yet, but I imagine fontconfig 
> > currently only matches charsets exactly.  It would be nice to search for
> > “all fonts containing at least <charset>”.
> 
> Your imagination differs from reality :).

Oh good :).  Does that mean that the logic is already what I want?

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Graphics Editor]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux