-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13-09-21 08:26 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > I don't think saving three characters (37.5%) is worth the hassle of > learning a fontconfig-specific set of digits for base 85. Agreed. Back when this code was written fontconfig was storing font caches in ASCII, so that representation was invented to store as much as possible. These days, it's irrelevant, so I agree that we should change it to something human-readable. Also, make it easy to ask for fonts having a specific character by making it easy to parse a simple set, something like this for example: $ fc-match :charset={06cc,064a} - -- behdad http://behdad.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJAh6AACgkQn+4E5dNTERVt6gCaA1Qkvret66e9Px3zzVvvaVvf tT4AniWSohwWOIuUVLAsIZe1uKjXjR0W =fBpP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig