Re: Can we use base 16, and not 85, for ASCII charset representations?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 13-09-23 02:47 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:25:45PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> 
> I haven't had time to look this up yet, but I imagine fontconfig 
> currently only matches charsets exactly.  It would be nice to search for
> “all fonts containing at least <charset>”.

Your imagination differs from reality :).

- -- 
behdad
http://behdad.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJAjdEACgkQn+4E5dNTERWL2gCdHIGqv38mlA1UbE70CnUY5lMJ
UQMAoLuz1wK1yYfzS1kqmz+IC/mFwU4n
=mr11
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Graphics Editor]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux