On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Andrey Ponomarenko <aponomarenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems to be binary compatible and there is no upstream soname bump > according to http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/fontconfig.html You're right. 2.9.0 is compatible with 2.8.0 and no changes in SONAME at all. Regards, > >> >> On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Ryan Schmidt<ryandesign@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 01:33, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: >>> >>>> fontconfig-2.9.0 no longer works with the old arch.patch. I created a >>>> new series to address this here: >>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20208 >>>> >>>> Hopefully they will be integrated into upstream this time. >>> >>> Thanks. I have this updated locally and it built fine. But it looks like >>> we have a new library version so I'll need to revbump all ports using >>> fontconfig, and I don't feel like figuring out that list of ports right now. >>> I'll get to it within a few days though. >>> >>> \r >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fontconfig mailing list >> Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig >> > > -- > Andrey Ponomarenko, ROSA Lab. > > > _______________________________________________ > Fontconfig mailing list > Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig -- Akira TAGOH _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
