Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Ugg.
Ryan, don't push the 2.9.0 yet then. Let's sort out the version change.
Akira, is fontconfig-2.9.0 really not binary compatible with the fontconfig-2.8.0 ABI? Was this library version bump accidental? If so, you should really get out a 2.9.1 ASAP and pull this 2.9.0 verison. If the binary incompatibility was intended, then this should've been released as 3.0 and called out in the release notes. This is a huge issue for packagers and needs to be called out.
It seems to be binary compatible and there is no upstream soname bump
according to http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/fontconfig.html
On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Ryan Schmidt<ryandesign@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 19, 2012, at 01:33, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
fontconfig-2.9.0 no longer works with the old arch.patch. I created a new series to address this here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20208
Hopefully they will be integrated into upstream this time.
Thanks. I have this updated locally and it built fine. But it looks like we have a new library version so I'll need to revbump all ports using fontconfig, and I don't feel like figuring out that list of ports right now. I'll get to it within a few days though.
\r
_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
--
Andrey Ponomarenko, ROSA Lab.
_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
