On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:13:41AM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 18:00 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > Ok, so it seems the package we want (for now) to be installed is > > > libvirt-daemon-driver-xen, and not libvirt-daemon-xen... Does that > > > sounds right? > > > > No, people want to be installing 'libvirt-daemon-xen' in most > > circumstances. This has deps to ensure that you have all the > > "recommended" packages required to run libvirt + xen together. > > libvirt-daemon-driver-xen, is just the bare minimum libvirt > > driver and nothing else, so is not what users typically want. > > > Well, this is a very fair point, with the only issue being that, if you > install 'libvirt-daemon-xen', things break! :-( > > How can we change that and make it work? Perhaps libvirt-daemon-xen > shouldn't bring in, as dependency, libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl, at least > not in versions where the libxl libvirt driver is known to be broken? The libxl driver should be disabled in Fedora versions whre it does not work. AFAIK, that was already done, so libxl is only used when built against newest Xen. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- xen mailing list xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
