On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 18:00 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Ok, so it seems the package we want (for now) to be installed is > > libvirt-daemon-driver-xen, and not libvirt-daemon-xen... Does that > > sounds right? > > No, people want to be installing 'libvirt-daemon-xen' in most > circumstances. This has deps to ensure that you have all the > "recommended" packages required to run libvirt + xen together. > libvirt-daemon-driver-xen, is just the bare minimum libvirt > driver and nothing else, so is not what users typically want. > Well, this is a very fair point, with the only issue being that, if you install 'libvirt-daemon-xen', things break! :-( How can we change that and make it work? Perhaps libvirt-daemon-xen shouldn't bring in, as dependency, libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl, at least not in versions where the libxl libvirt driver is known to be broken? Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- xen mailing list xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
