On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:47:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:07:15AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 05:45:51PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:24:31PM +0100, Andy Burns wrote: > > > > Given that xen is entering feature freeze for updated release ~August > > > > is it too early to ask what the *hopes* are for xen in fedora10? > > > > > > > > xen 3.3.0 (or late rc) or is this still likely to be 3.2.1 or 3.2.2? > > > > > > Even though we don't have any Dom0 I'll update it to 3.3.0 for the xen > > > RPM and hypervisor. This will at least let people build their own legacy > > > Xen kernel from upstream's 2.6.18 xen kernel if they're lucky enough to > > > have hardware which works with it. > > > > > > > If pv_ops dom0 won't be ready for F10, would it be possible to ship > > xensource 2.6.18 based dom0 kernel? At least that's supported upstream.. > > > > Would be better than nothing.. > > No, it is worse than nothing. It is incompatible with a large number of > userspace packages which expect interfaces/ABIs from newer kernel versions > and thus uttery unsupportable. > Yeah well, that makes sense.. damn, really crappy situation right now with kernels compatible with xen dom0 :( -- Pasi -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
