Re: F10 crystal ball gazing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:07:15AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 05:45:51PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:24:31PM +0100, Andy Burns wrote:
> > > Given that xen is entering feature freeze for updated release ~August
> > > is it too early to ask what the *hopes* are for xen in fedora10?
> > > 
> > > xen 3.3.0 (or late rc) or is this still likely to be 3.2.1 or 3.2.2?
> > 
> > Even though we don't have any Dom0 I'll update it to 3.3.0 for the xen
> > RPM and hypervisor. This will at least let people build their own legacy
> > Xen kernel from upstream's 2.6.18 xen kernel if they're lucky enough to
> > have hardware which works with it.
> > 
> 
> If pv_ops dom0 won't be ready for F10, would it be possible to ship
> xensource 2.6.18 based dom0 kernel? At least that's supported upstream.. 
> 
> Would be better than nothing.. 
> 

Or maybe rhel5 kernel? 

I understand maintaining multiple kernels is a pain, but then again rhel5
(and xensource 2.6.18 xen) kernels are maintained anyway upstream..

-- Pasi

--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General]     [Fedora Music]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Directory]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux