On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:07:15AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 05:45:51PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:24:31PM +0100, Andy Burns wrote: > > > Given that xen is entering feature freeze for updated release ~August > > > is it too early to ask what the *hopes* are for xen in fedora10? > > > > > > xen 3.3.0 (or late rc) or is this still likely to be 3.2.1 or 3.2.2? > > > > Even though we don't have any Dom0 I'll update it to 3.3.0 for the xen > > RPM and hypervisor. This will at least let people build their own legacy > > Xen kernel from upstream's 2.6.18 xen kernel if they're lucky enough to > > have hardware which works with it. > > > > If pv_ops dom0 won't be ready for F10, would it be possible to ship > xensource 2.6.18 based dom0 kernel? At least that's supported upstream.. > > Would be better than nothing.. No, it is worse than nothing. It is incompatible with a large number of userspace packages which expect interfaces/ABIs from newer kernel versions and thus uttery unsupportable. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
