On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:02:13PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Michal Jaegermann (michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Well, Lennart says explicitely that with systemd and /usr mounted > > on its own file system things like audio, or printing or plug'n'play > > will not work and that he does not care as they were broken anyway. > > Maybe in some of his warped universe as I can assure you that up and > > including Fedora 14, and with /usr like the above, all these things > > do work just fine. > > Essentially, you have to ensure that everything called during the > boot cycle up until the point that /usr is mounted, In Fedora 14 instead of weird excuses you run in /etc/init.d/udev-post /sbin/udevadm trigger --type=failed --action=add Most likely ensuring that something of that sort is present in an appropriate place of a boot sequence would solve the issue in practice. > So, then > it's a cost-benefit ratio, and weigh that at against the usage case > of separate /usr (which is.... ?) I do not have statistics and you do not have them either. I have seen quite a few in various places. So how much of such breakage is ok? Michal -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
