On 04/26/2011 11:18 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> systemd comes with extensive documentation and your typical response to >> all changes isn't applicable here. If you are going to claim lack of >> documentation, can you be more specific? >> >> http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/ >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd > > That includes links to such "perls of wisdom" as > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken > which in effect says: "I broke it and I totally do not care. Anyway, > this is all your fault as you are stupid enough to run a system > laid out not the way I like it." Why I am not surprised? Did you read it? It actually says "I did not break it - it's been broken for a while in a number of different ways". -- --Per Bothner per@xxxxxxxxxxx http://per.bothner.com/ -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
