On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > systemd comes with extensive documentation and your typical response to > all changes isn't applicable here. If you are going to claim lack of > documentation, can you be more specific? > > http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/ > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd That includes links to such "perls of wisdom" as http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken which in effect says: "I broke it and I totally do not care. Anyway, this is all your fault as you are stupid enough to run a system laid out not the way I like it." Why I am not surprised? BTW - on the first peek it looks that a run of 'udevadm trigger' would "fix it". Michal -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
