On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:18 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > systemd comes with extensive documentation and your typical response to > > all changes isn't applicable here. If you are going to claim lack of > > documentation, can you be more specific? > > > > http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/ > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd > > That includes links to such "perls of wisdom" as > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken > which in effect says: "I broke it and I totally do not care. Anyway, > this is all your fault as you are stupid enough to run a system > laid out not the way I like it." Why I am not surprised? Um. It seems like you failed to read the five points at the bottom. None of this is specific to systemd, and none of it has changed recently. Systemd is just being polite enough to let you know that mounting /usr separately is a configuration that can cause problems, regardless of whether you're using systemd. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
