On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:19:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:18 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > systemd comes with extensive documentation and your typical response to > > > all changes isn't applicable here. If you are going to claim lack of > > > documentation, can you be more specific? > > > > > > http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/ > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd > > > > That includes links to such "perls of wisdom" as > > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken > > which in effect says: "I broke it and I totally do not care. Anyway, > > this is all your fault as you are stupid enough to run a system > > laid out not the way I like it." Why I am not surprised? > > Um. It seems like you failed to read the five points at the bottom. Yes, I read them. Nice excuses. They do not change reality. Michal -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
