Hi, 2011/4/26 Michal Jaegermann <michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:25:47AM -0700, Per Bothner wrote: >> On 04/26/2011 11:18 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> systemd comes with extensive documentation and your typical response to >> >> all changes isn't applicable here. If you are going to claim lack of >> >> documentation, can you be more specific? >> >> >> >> http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/ >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd >> > >> > That includes links to such "perls of wisdom" as >> > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken >> > which in effect says: "I broke it and I totally do not care. Anyway, >> > this is all your fault as you are stupid enough to run a system >> > laid out not the way I like it." Why I am not surprised? >> >> Did you read it? It actually says "I did not break it - it's been >> broken for a while in a number of different ways". > > Yes, I read it. That is a very feeble excuse as what's "been broken > for a while" works just fine now so that claim is at least stretching > reality. > > Watching for some time on lkml how kernel developers try to avoid > breaking existing working systems could be educational. AFAIK systemd adds only a warning about /usr on separate partition - nothing more. > > Michal > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
