On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 09:14 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:58:26 +0000, > "\"JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson\"" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03/17/2011 08:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Alpha: Actually account for firstboot, which we completely ignored until > > > now. The criterion about 'booting to a working desktop' was split into > > > two and now covers firstboot. I also explicitly called out encryption > > > here, and tweaked the language about 'user intervention' to 'unintended > > > user intervention'. > > > > I think we should continue to ignore it along with not depending alpha > > on a working graphical desktop or in more current terms graphical.target > > of any kind > > I disagree with this. A lot of what we want tested needs a graphical desktop. > If we were to ship an Alpha without a working desktop, we wouldn't get much > feedback (other than that the desktop doesn't work). I agree with Bruno. The suggestion conflicts with one of the stated objectives of the Alpha, "Test accepted features of Fedora 15" as this would prevent testing of any desktop-related features. That said, if we ever have SIG-specific criteria, the proposed change would be perfectly suitable criteria for the Server-SIG. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
