On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:58:26 +0000, "\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/17/2011 08:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Alpha: Actually account for firstboot, which we completely ignored until > > now. The criterion about 'booting to a working desktop' was split into > > two and now covers firstboot. I also explicitly called out encryption > > here, and tweaked the language about 'user intervention' to 'unintended > > user intervention'. > > I think we should continue to ignore it along with not depending alpha > on a working graphical desktop or in more current terms graphical.target > of any kind I disagree with this. A lot of what we want tested needs a graphical desktop. If we were to ship an Alpha without a working desktop, we wouldn't get much feedback (other than that the desktop doesn't work). -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
