On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 12:56 -0500, John Watzke wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, James Laska <jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:58 -0500, John Watzke wrote: > > Thanks Thomas. This will work great. Now we just need > to figure > > out how to drive this initiative. > > > I think you just did! Best way to start, is by discussing and > following > up. > > > Okay, let me look over the test case and test plan templates and > see what can be put together. I do like your suggestion of starting > with the heavy hitters such as firefox/kernel/glibc. That will get us > started and we can work our way down to the more obscure test cases. > > Sometime this week, I'll put up a wiki page with a general list of > known critpath packages. This will give us a working set to start on. > I'm thinking we can use that list to let folks "sign up" to track down > the maintainer and work through the processing of defining a test case > for the package and perhaps updating the status of preparing the > tests. Nothing too fancy... just something to keep some status on. Awesome, I appreciate your initiative here :) If you find it helpful to manage status and coordinate efforts with multiple proventesters, feel free to file tickets in the fedora-qa TRAC instance. Let me know if you'd like to create any additional TRAC milestones to organize this effort. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
